Match log
Every match, with what Court IQ learned from it
Forehand carried the match while short backhand returns handed the opponent the net. Deciding tiebreak lost on rushed first volleys.
“Forehand was the best part of my game tonight. I could not get a backhand return deep all night against his lefty slice — every one sat short and he came in. Second serve actually held up. Lost the tiebreak on two rushed first volleys.”
- • Backhand return sat short against lefty slice.
- • Return depth invited the opponent forward.
- • Forehand was dependable all match.
View full breakdown →
Serving and partner coverage won the match; floated first volleys remain the leak.
“Chris and I served well and closed the breaker. My first volley was late again — floated three of them. Backhand return was better because I stood in closer.”
- • First volley floated under pressure.
- • First serve set up easy plus-one balls.
- • Standing closer improved backhand return.
View full breakdown →
Patient point construction and net finishing produced a straightforward win.
“Patient against Dave. Built points with the forehand and finished at net when the ball got short. Backhand depth still short but it did not cost me today.”
- • Point construction was clear and patient.
- • Good recognition of short balls.
- • Backhand depth remains short.
View full breakdown →
Second serve and backhand return were both exposed; tightness at the end of set two cost the match.
“Second serve got attacked all match. Backhand return again — she stepped in and took time away. Got tight at 5-5 in the second.”
- • Second serve was too attackable.
- • Backhand return broke down against an aggressive returner.
- • Tightness in the closing games.
View full breakdown →
Deep returns and middle control produced a comfortable social doubles win.
“Fun social doubles with Chris. Returns were deep and we controlled the middle. Missed a couple of easy overheads.”
- • Return depth was strong.
- • Overhead misses on easy balls.
View full breakdown →
Backhand collapsed once stretched wide; first volley and net play were the deciding weakness.
“Backhand fell apart in the second set once he started pushing me wide. First volleys were poor again. Legs were fine in the third.”
- • Backhand consistency dropped when stretched wide.
- • First volley continues to break down.
- • Endurance held up into a third set.
View full breakdown →
“Practice sets, tiebreaks only.”
View full breakdown →
Serve plus targeted patterns produced a clean win.
“Served well and kept the ball to his backhand. Solid all around.”
View full breakdown →
Doubles breaker lost on floated first volleys.
“Lost the breaker. My first volley floated and they teed off on it.”
View full breakdown →
Dominant recreational win with a clean forehand.
“Easy hit-and-count. Forehand felt clean.”
View full breakdown →
Strong partnership play and low deep returns.
“Chris poached well. My returns stayed low and deep.”
View full breakdown →
Second serve reliability and lefty slice returns were both liabilities.
“Second serve double faults hurt. Could not handle the lefty slice serve.”
View full breakdown →
Composure in the deciding tiebreak plus forehand aggression closed it out.
“Stayed calm in the breaker for once. Ran forehands whenever I could.”
View full breakdown →
Passive net play cost a close social doubles match.
“Net play was passive. Too many defensive first volleys.”
View full breakdown →
Complete performance including improved backhand depth.
“Everything worked. Deep backhands for once.”
View full breakdown →